Calendar

August 2017
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 << < > >>
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Announce

Who's Online?

Member: 0
Visitor: 1

rss Syndication

Sep/02/2016 - 08:23:51 am

Paul Dansker Explaining the Medical Malpractice and Proximate Cause

"It wasn't my fault!" That sentiment may be the familiar response of a school-age child when something goes awry. But it is also the essential point that a defendant may try to make while facing a medical malpractice lawsuit, particularly when a number of people and institutions have some connection to the injury. Paul Dansker says that the legal principle is "proximate fault", meaning the responsible party had some role in causing a medical injury. While it sounds and is a complex affair to sort out, personal injury attorneys who specialize in medical malpractice cases (also called a "medical malpractice lawyer") are very good at sorting out and assigning blame. 

Sometimes the protestation holds true, and sometimes it does not. Proximate cause is about a chain reaction, where Party A does something that affects Party B that in turn adversely affects Party C. A case in point might be when a hospital, in a cost-cutting move, reduces the size of its nursing and other allied health professional staff. A patient receives inadequate attention because of this reduced staff, and then suffers brain damage because a respirator was improperly monitored. The principle of proximate cause lays blame on the hospital itself for failing to provide services required by the standard of care. 

Proximate cause can also prove innocence. This happens when a mistake is made but which had no bearing on the injury. For example, if a doctor prescribed a medication to that patient, but due to an error at the hospital pharmacy (perhaps misreading the doctor's handwritten prescription) the wrong medication was administered - and yet the wrong medication had no ill effect on the patient. Through testimony of an expert medical witness, the disconnection between the doctor and patient, and pharmacy and patient, can be made. The accident might still attributed to understaffing by the hospital. 

Note that if, instead, the incorrect medication is found by the court (through expert testimony) to have contributed to the patient's injury, the principle of contributory negligence could lay partial blame on the doctor and perhaps the pharmacy, along with the hospital. 

How proximate cause affects a malpractice settlement 

Under medical malpractice laws in New York, as in most states, the originator of the medical error bears full or partial responsibility for compensating the victim. 

When a qualified medical malpractice attorney like Mr. Paul Dansker is hired, a proper investigation to determine where to place blame will be conducted. Experienced attorneys know what to investigate, which party or parties are responsible and how they might construction their defense. This experience is crucial to achieving the best settlement. Due to a one-year statute of limitations, it is important to contact a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible after the injury occurs or is discovered. 

NY medical malpractice lawyer Paul Dansker & Aspromonte Associates has recovered millions of dollars for malpractice victims including obstetrics, anaesthesia, cardiology and others. We have the skill and experience to help you obtain maximum compensation for your medical bills, wage loss, pain and suffering, and other hardships.

For more reading please click here
Admin · 20 views · Leave a comment

Permanent link to full entry

http://pauldansker.sosblogs.com/f1-b1/Paul-Dansker-Explaining-the-Medical-Malpractice-and-Proximate-Cause-b1-p9.htm

Comments

No Comment for this post yet...


Leave a comment

New feedback status: Published





Your URL will be displayed.


Please enter the code written in the picture.


Comment text

Options
   (Set cookies for name, e-mail and url)